“The great thing about social media was how it gave a voice to voiceless people.” – Jon Ronson
Despite my infinite respect for Jon Ronson as a writer and person, I cannot help but approach this quote with a certain degree of uncensored skepticism. Although I would agree that social media has the potential to be an open space in which people whose paths may not otherwise cross have the opportunity to find friendships, whether that is the result in many cases is another question. I would also agree that people of a similar age to me do find it considerably easier to talk online, through the casual medium of superficial slang, however is that always a positive? Hiding behind screens is an easier position to critique from than face-to-face, which can result in hurtful things being sent. After all, another Jon Ronson quote is: “With social media, we’ve created a stage for constant artificial high drama. Every day a new person emerges as a magnificent hero or a sickening villain.” Evidently, even Ronson himself is aware of the inevitable stumbling blocks of social media.
I also believe that the use of the word “was” is very crucial to Ronson’s point in his statement. This suggests that although initially it was a definite positive that voiceless people were given a voice, now some people’s voices may spew words unhelpful. They were voiceless, but now they can be faceless, and they sneer and scorn from the safety of their unknown location – simply a username on a screen. I also believe Ronson talks about the great thing about social media deliberately, as even before it was twisted in its use, there were few great things about it.
Despite my dubiety, this quote is seemingly intended to commend rather than curse, and even my cynical self can’t deny the infinite wisdom shared over social media. There’s no doubt that the blossoming of social media alongside other technological developments has had a colossal impact on our modern society, for example not only our eased communication with people around us but with the whole world – thoughts and ideas can be shared within moments of their construction.
Alongside ideas, help is also so much easier to find on a platform of this kind – reaching out has never been easier. From checking up on your mates if they’ve been feeling down to forwarding links to helplines they might need, social media has undoubtedly helped break down barriers of isolation among teens. Internet friends are not something I ever imagined as a younger child to be practical, but they are relied upon by some otherwise “voiceless” people, who find it difficult to connect in person.
Despite this, as humans we are social creatures. Being on “social” media does not make you any more social than standing in a garage makes you a car. To be social is to engage with other communities and people, not simply to voice opinions behind the cover of the internet. Although internet friends may seem a blessing, their prospect might just have negative contributions. Whether the voiceless people may be disabled, shy, or just socially awkward, with the ability to rely upon internet friends they may never have to actually interact socially in person. This could lead to them becoming insular because of their ability to filter the people they come into contact with, and therefore be lacking in everyday social skills, such as interacting with a variety of people. This could be massively detrimental when it comes to times in which that level of personal interaction is critical, from job interviews even to family gatherings.
All in all, I (as I’m sure you can tell) regard social media with a generally negative attitude. Although I disagree with the compulsive behaviour it generates and the “constant artificial high drama”, I would agree with this specific Ronson quote, essentially because of the use of the word “was”. I believe that social media (or something of the sort) was inevitable, and is a necessary evil. Can you imagine the range of effects if social media had come about at a different period of history – the time of the Suffragettes, for example? How might their campaign have been impacted- would we have seen millions taking to the streets in pre-organised efforts, and a revolution that made international headlines? We will never know, but I think that we should make the most of the potential benefit that is social media in this time when we’re lucky enough to have it. Let’s let the voiceless people have voices, whatever they may say.
I absolutely love it even tho I ain’t read any of it .
very interesting ideas, particularly single word analysis. impressive
I think this shows how good Catherine Solway is at writing
Mature beyond your years.
A lot of really interesting points and I like the open mindedness you approach the question with. Good stuff!
I agree with Callum, solid analysis and assessment on this relevant topic 👌
Does being on social media really not make you any more sociable than standing in a garage makes you a car? One of the most striking flaws of this analogy is that it falls victim to the bifurcation fallacy, refusing to acknowledge the distinction between the continuum of sociability and binary nature of the label ‘car’. Surely interacting with new people and communities online is a social act, fulfilling your arbitrary definition of ‘engage(ing) with other communities and people’ and making someone more social that they otherwise would be?
But does social media make somebody more social than they otherwise would be? I think that this is an excellent point that you have made, Catherine, and I would argue against you Halloumi that without social media, an individual would be more inclined to engage with others, as just like Catherine said, humans are social creatures by nature. The ability to shut yourself off with many other highly filtered profiles surely doesn’t make you a social person.
I would argue that humans have always had the ability to shut themselves off and that many have. Social media is more likely to bring those people out of exclusion with easy access to communicative resources. Many people maintain healthy and positive relationships over social media. What but intuition makes the internet seem like a less viable place to socialise?
Socialisation has the potential to be considerably more of a negative experience online, however I would agree with you that fundamentally the internet is an equally viable place to socialise. Although there are certainly many positive relationships maintained online, their influence on the younger generations, who are still developing their social abilities, may not be as positive as we’d like to think. People can be dubious to the fact, with all the false and/or exaggerated information portrayed by the media, that the digital social networking platform that our children our being raised on can be damaging
I see your point, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. Although the ease of sociability has increased, this has come at the cost of much meaningful social interaction.
Nice writing Catherine!
I love this!